Maximizing Revenue: Price & Attendance Trade-off
An amusement park charges admission price (P) and averages 2000 tickets (T) sold per day. A survey shows that, for each increase in the admission cost, 100 fewer people would visit the park. Write an equation to express the revenue (R), in terms of a price increase of x dollars and then determine the admission price that gives the maximum revenue.
What This Problem Teaches
- How to model revenue as the product of price and quantity when both depend on the same variable
- Writing quadratic functions from real-world constraints and relationships
- Finding maximum values using the vertex formula for parabolas
- Understanding the economic concept of price elasticity through mathematical optimization
- Interpreting why revenue functions create downward-opening parabolas in competitive markets
Solution: Method 1 — The Revenue Optimization Approach
Step 1 — Express price and attendance in terms of x
Let x represent the price increase in dollars. The current admission price is P dollars, so after the increase, the new price becomes:
Currently, 2000 tickets are sold per day. For each $1 increase, 100 fewer people visit. So after an increase of x dollars, the number of tickets sold becomes:
Step 2 — Write the revenue function
Revenue equals price times quantity sold. Multiplying our expressions from Step 1:
Step 3 — Expand to standard quadratic form
Let's distribute this product to see the quadratic structure clearly:
R(x) = P(2000) - P(100x) + x(2000) - x(100x)
R(x) = 2000P - 100Px + 2000x - 100x²
R(x) = -100x² + (2000 - 100P)x + 2000P
Step 4 — Find the vertex for maximum revenue
This is a quadratic function in the form ax² + bx + c where:
a = -100(negative, so parabola opens downward)b = 2000 - 100Pc = 2000P
The maximum occurs at the vertex, where x = -b/(2a):
x = -(2000 - 100P)/(-200)
x = (2000 - 100P)/200
x = 10 - 0.5P
Step 5 — Calculate the optimal admission price
The optimal price increase is x = 10 - 0.5P. The optimal total admission price is:
Optimal price = P + (10 - 0.5P)
Optimal price = 10 + 0.5P
Solution: Method 2 — The Symmetry Approach
Step 1 — Identify the linear factors
Revenue is the product of two linear functions: price f(x) = P + x and attendance g(x) = 2000 - 100x. When we multiply two linear functions, we get a quadratic with specific symmetry properties.
Step 2 — Find where revenue equals zero
The revenue function R(x) = (P + x)(2000 - 100x) equals zero when either factor equals zero:
2000 - 100x = 0 → x = 20
Step 3 — Use symmetry to find the maximum
For a quadratic function, the vertex (maximum) occurs exactly halfway between the x-intercepts. The x-intercepts are at x = -P and x = 20, so:
Step 4 — Calculate optimal price
The optimal admission price is P + x = P + (10 - 0.5P) = 10 + 0.5P, confirming our first method.
Optimal Price Increase: x = 10 - 0.5P dollars
Optimal Admission Price: 10 + 0.5P dollars
Verification
Let's verify our formula works by testing with a specific value. Suppose the current price is P = $20:
Optimal price: 10 + 0.5(20) = 20
This means if the current price is already $20, no change is needed for maximum revenue. Let's check by substituting into our revenue function:
R(x) = -100x² + 0x + 40000
R(x) = 40000 - 100x²
This function is clearly maximized when x = 0, confirming our result. ✓
Let's also verify with P = $10:
Optimal price: 10 + 0.5(10) = 15
At x = 5: price = $15, attendance = 1500, revenue = $22,500
At x = 4: price = $14, attendance = 1600, revenue = $22,400
At x = 6: price = $16, attendance = 1400, revenue = $22,400
The revenue is indeed highest at our calculated optimum. ✓
Watch Out For These
Some students assume P has a specific value (like $10) and solve for a numerical answer. The problem asks for the general optimal price in terms of P. The answer
10 + 0.5P shows how the optimal price depends on the starting price.
Writing attendance as
2000 + 100x instead of 2000 - 100x. The problem clearly states that attendance decreases with price increases, so we subtract 100x.
Trying to maximize attendance
(2000 - 100x) or price (P + x) separately, rather than their product. Revenue optimization requires balancing both factors.
Using
x = b/(2a) instead of x = -b/(2a). Since a = -100 and b = 2000 - 100P, the correct calculation is x = -(2000 - 100P)/(2×(-100)) = 10 - 0.5P.
The Math Beneath the Surface
This problem exemplifies a fundamental pattern in economics and optimization: revenue maximization with linear demand. The general form is:
When expanded, this always creates a quadratic function R(x) = ax² + bx + c where a < 0 (downward parabola). The coefficient a represents the demand sensitivity—how much quantity drops per unit price increase.
In our case, the sensitivity is 100 customers per dollar, giving a = -100. Higher sensitivity (steeper demand curve) means a sharper revenue peak, while lower sensitivity creates a flatter optimum.
The key insight: optimal pricing always balances the trade-off between margin and volume. Raise prices too much, and you lose too many customers. Keep prices too low, and you miss profit potential. The mathematical optimum finds that perfect balance.
Real Applications
Concert venues and sports teams use this exact model when setting ticket prices. They survey price sensitivity and optimize for maximum gate revenue, often finding that moderate price increases boost total income despite smaller crowds.
Subscription services like Netflix apply similar analysis when adjusting monthly fees. They measure subscriber churn rates against price increases to find the revenue-maximizing price point.
Manufacturing companies use revenue optimization when launching products. Higher prices mean better profit margins but fewer units sold. The optimal price maximizes total revenue before considering production costs.
What If?
Price after increase: 25 + x
Attendance after increase: 1800 - 60x
R(x) = (25 + x)(1800 - 60x)
R(x) = -60x² + (1800 - 1500)x + 45000 = -60x² + 300x + 45000
x = -300/(2×(-60)) = 300/120 = 2.5
Optimal price = 25 + 2.5 = $27.50
At $27.50: attendance = 1650, revenue = $45,375
At $27: attendance = 1680, revenue = $45,360
At $28: attendance = 1620, revenue = $45,360 ✓
Profit = Revenue - CostsProfit(x) = (15 + x)(2000 - 100x) - 18000
Revenue = -100x² + (2000 - 1500)x + 30000 = -100x² + 500x + 30000
Profit(x) = -100x² + 500x + 30000 - 18000 = -100x² + 500x + 12000
x = -500/(2×(-100)) = 500/200 = 2.5
Optimal price = 15 + 2.5 = $17.50
At $17.50: attendance = 1750, revenue = $30,625, profit = $12,625
Note: Profit optimization gives the same result as revenue optimization when costs are fixed! ✓
With P = 12: R(x) = (12 + x)(2000 - 100x) = 30000
-100x² + 800x + 24000 = 30000-100x² + 800x - 6000 = 0x² - 8x + 60 = 0
x = (8 ± √(64 - 240))/2 = (8 ± √(-176))/2
Since the discriminant is negative, there are no real solutions.
Maximum occurs at x = 4: price = $16, attendance = 1600, revenue = $25,600
$30,000 revenue is impossible with this demand curve.
Current: $18 price, 1500 visitors
Sensitivity: 50 fewer per $1 increase
Optimal price: $22
For optimal price = 10 + 0.5P where P is current price:22 = 10 + 0.5PP = 24
If current price is $24 but they charge $18, that's a $6 decrease.
Base attendance = 1500 - 50×(-6) = 1500 + 300 = 1800
Price increase from $24 to $22 is -$2.
Attendance = 1800 - 50×(-2) = 1800 + 100 = 1900
Wait—this doesn't make sense! Let me recalculate...
Actually, if $18 is current and $22 is optimal, the increase is +$4.
Optimal attendance = 1500 - 50×4 = 1300 visitors ✓
Frequently Asked Questions
Revenue equals price times quantity sold, so R = P × Q. When both price and quantity depend on the same variable (like a price increase x), substitute both expressions. In this problem, price becomes P + x and quantity becomes 2000 - 100x, giving R(x) = (P + x)(2000 - 100x).
Revenue functions in price-demand problems are quadratic because you multiply two linear expressions (price and quantity). This creates a downward-opening parabola since higher prices eventually reduce total sales enough to decrease revenue. The vertex represents the optimal balance between price and volume.
Price increase (x) is the change from current price, while total price is the final amount charged. Here, if the optimal increase is x = 10 - 0.5P, then the optimal total price is P + x = 10 + 0.5P. The key insight is that the optimal total price depends on the starting price P.
2026-05-20